profile

👋 Hi, I'm Adam.

🚦 challenger ICP teardown

Published 4 months ago • 2 min read

Seeing Keyplay featured in last week's Growth Unhinged newsletter was a big high for me (even bigger than the Halloween sugar high). 🎃🕺 If you are building an outbound motion, it's worth checking out the story from Thena. I'm very impressed by their GTM strategy and and Brendan Kazanjian has been the ultimate power user.


CHALLENGER ICP ANALYSIS: LINEAR DEEP DIVE

As Geoffrey Moore teaches, startups need to win an early market before “crossing the chasm.”

It requires strategic focus. Smart challengers don’t play everywhere that the incumbent competitor plays.

Today's deck shows this point with data and graphs 📊.

The example study is Linear vs Atlassian. I mentioned them last week and wanted to go deeper. In the data, we see a sharp contrast between the challenger's early market (Linear) and the incumbent's increasingly broad approach (Atlassian Jira).

This analysis comes from a sample of each company's customer list. We pulled the "featured" customers from each company's website (~100 each) and then compared the two ICPs from several different angles. This is similar to the work we do for Keyplay customers, but we look more holistically at their closed won.

Let's breakdown some of the themes from Linear vs Jira...

Category Focus

Atlassian Jira has case studies in every industry. Linear has focused on emerging, software-centric categories.

95% of Linear featured customers are in SaaS, Fintech, Online Marketplaces, or Health Tech. Companies in these software-centric categories buy into Linear’s product development methodology, elegant UX, and “modern” approach.

Contrast that to the incumbent. Atlassian has 200K+ customers, across every industry. McDonald’s uses Jira. So does Audi, Airbus, Adobe, Target, Hilton, many major governments. It's become a "default" product much like Salesforce in CRM. You don't get fired for buying Jira.

Rising Stars

As the incumbent classically goes up market, the challenger wins with smaller, faster-moving companies.

83% of Jira’s feature companies are larger than 1,000 employees. Linear highlights smaller customers, almost all of them VC-backed, and remote workplaces.

But this is not a pure SMB vs ENT strategy. Linear has focused on rising companies with growth potential, positioning for the next generation.

60% of feature customers were founded in the last 5 years, 41% have raised $100M+.

The CTA on Linear’s customer page is beautifully consistent with their market strategy. It’s clear this product is targeting the rising stars.

"Modern" Mindset

Linear's homepage message called their product "the new standard for modern software development." The idea of a modern approach is pervasive in Linear's external message, POV, product focus, and customer list.

We see it in the charts above -- founding date, remote work, modern categories. It also shows up in the correlated technologies being used by Linear customers.

This chart is a bit of an eye-sore, but shows some clear patterns. Atlassian customers lean much more toward incumbent vendors across their stack -- Salesforce, Adobe, Workday, Microsoft, Oracle. Meanwhile, Linear customers appear to lean more toward second and third wave vendors in many of these categories -- Intercom, Ashby, HubSpot, Amplitude.

The Pattern

I shared this chart last week and I'm clearly still obsessing over the bigger picture pattern. There are lots of versions that we can study going forward.

Linear's approach works for them, but this kind of focus can take many forms. I started brainstorming a short list of ways that challengers "attach" to specific ICPs. I came up with the following 4:

What else would you add to this list?

Reply or join the conversation on LinkedIn.

p.s. If you are looking for this kind of data on your customer list, Keyplay can make it happen for you! As part of our free POC process we can crunch the numbers on your customers list, find lookalikes, and hone your ICP model.

Just reply here with a little background and I'll get the process started for you.

Best,
Adam


Have a B2B tech company in mind you’d like us to track?

Fill out this form.

👋 Hi, I'm Adam.

I'm chief analyst here at PeerSignal and CEO/co-founder of Keyplay. Join 17K+ B2B SaaS leaders who study modern GTM with my almost-weekly newsletter.

Read more from 👋 Hi, I'm Adam.

Quick ask: If you are the Keyplay customer who shared this case study with Scott, can you email or DM me? In a time when efficiency is key, I love seeing a 60% reduction in cost per opportunity! I'm hoping to hear more about the details. 👇 We're finding a lot of leverage from bringing ICP into focus for 2024. TALE OF TWO CITIES? These 30 B2B software companies have added a whopping ~26K employees in the last 18 months. They’ve grown ~43% in that time and continue hiring today. Some never...

about 1 month ago • 1 min read

Welcome back and happy new year! 🎉 Entering 2024, we have reason to be optimistic in SaaS. Maybe a few green shoots? I shared this chart on LinkedIn today. Following a big drop in H2 2022, we saw the number of open roles in PeerSignal's index of 10K SaaS companies start to climb in the back half of 2023. Across our index there are ~92K open roles at the start of this month. Not quite back to the levels we saw in mid-2022, but a positive trend since January 2023. Note: This focuses on...

about 2 months ago • 3 min read

I'm proud of these G2 reviews. Hoping to see 1 more before Thanksgiving. 🦃 THE AI GOLD RUSH AI features have very quickly become table stakes in SaaS. We all see it happening. Today I analyzed 17K SaaS companies to better understand how & where it's happening. Overall, a whopping 33% of SaaS companies now promote some AI features or capabilities. This graphic shows a quick breakdown (keep scrolling for details) AI isn’t new. But the Generative AI gold rush kicked into full gear following...

4 months ago • 4 min read
Share this post