Seeing Keyplay featured in last week's Growth Unhinged newsletter was a big high for me (even bigger than the Halloween sugar high). 🎃🕺 If you are building an outbound motion, it's worth checking out the story from Thena. I'm very impressed by their GTM strategy and and Brendan Kazanjian has been the ultimate power user.
CHALLENGER ICP ANALYSIS: LINEAR DEEP DIVE
As Geoffrey Moore teaches, startups need to win an early market before “crossing the chasm.”
It requires strategic focus. Smart challengers don’t play everywhere that the incumbent competitor plays.
Today's deck shows this point with data and graphs 📊.
The example study is Linear vs Atlassian. I mentioned them last week and wanted to go deeper. In the data, we see a sharp contrast between the challenger's early market (Linear) and the incumbent's increasingly broad approach (Atlassian Jira).
This analysis comes from a sample of each company's customer list. We pulled the "featured" customers from each company's website (~100 each) and then compared the two ICPs from several different angles. This is similar to the work we do for Keyplay customers, but we look more holistically at their closed won.
Let's breakdown some of the themes from Linear vs Jira...
Atlassian Jira has case studies in every industry. Linear has focused on emerging, software-centric categories.
95% of Linear featured customers are in SaaS, Fintech, Online Marketplaces, or Health Tech. Companies in these software-centric categories buy into Linear’s product development methodology, elegant UX, and “modern” approach.
Contrast that to the incumbent. Atlassian has 200K+ customers, across every industry. McDonald’s uses Jira. So does Audi, Airbus, Adobe, Target, Hilton, many major governments. It's become a "default" product much like Salesforce in CRM. You don't get fired for buying Jira.
As the incumbent classically goes up market, the challenger wins with smaller, faster-moving companies.
83% of Jira’s feature companies are larger than 1,000 employees. Linear highlights smaller customers, almost all of them VC-backed, and remote workplaces.
But this is not a pure SMB vs ENT strategy. Linear has focused on rising companies with growth potential, positioning for the next generation.
60% of feature customers were founded in the last 5 years, 41% have raised $100M+.
The CTA on Linear’s customer page is beautifully consistent with their market strategy. It’s clear this product is targeting the rising stars.
Linear's homepage message called their product "the new standard for modern software development." The idea of a modern approach is pervasive in Linear's external message, POV, product focus, and customer list.
We see it in the charts above -- founding date, remote work, modern categories. It also shows up in the correlated technologies being used by Linear customers.
This chart is a bit of an eye-sore, but shows some clear patterns. Atlassian customers lean much more toward incumbent vendors across their stack -- Salesforce, Adobe, Workday, Microsoft, Oracle. Meanwhile, Linear customers appear to lean more toward second and third wave vendors in many of these categories -- Intercom, Ashby, HubSpot, Amplitude.
I shared this chart last week and I'm clearly still obsessing over the bigger picture pattern. There are lots of versions that we can study going forward.
Linear's approach works for them, but this kind of focus can take many forms. I started brainstorming a short list of ways that challengers "attach" to specific ICPs. I came up with the following 4:
What else would you add to this list?
Reply or join the conversation on LinkedIn.
p.s. If you are looking for this kind of data on your customer list, Keyplay can make it happen for you! As part of our free POC process we can crunch the numbers on your customers list, find lookalikes, and hone your ICP model.
Just reply here with a little background and I'll get the process started for you.
Best,
Adam
Have a B2B tech company in mind you’d like us to track?
Fill out this form.
I'm chief analyst here at PeerSignal and CEO/co-founder of Keyplay. Join 17K+ B2B SaaS leaders who study modern GTM with my almost-weekly newsletter.
Every August, Forbes and BVP publish the Cloud 100 list, highlighting the most valuable private SaaS & Cloud companies. I love analyzing this list. Each year I publish my Cloud 100 spreadsheet (free to download, enriched by Keyplay) and share my take-aways. It’s a great way to spot themes and find role models. Let's look at how this year's Cloud 100 differ from peers, what’s trending, and highlight clues about the modern SaaS playbook. Here’s what stood out from 2024... AI is Eating Software...
Three weeks ago, we shared a work-in-progress market map to help you unbundle ABM. It resonated with thousands of practitioners who are pro-ABM but skeptical of “ABM Platforms”. Today we’re sharing our new and improved Unbundling ABM Market Map. We listened to feedback and used it to hone our categorization, create new ones, and add new players. What’s new: Based on feedback, we made a couple of big changes & improvements (spreadsheet here). We: Broke signal creators into 3P, 2P, and 1P. The...
Today, we shared a work-in-progress market map to help you unbundle ABM. If you’re pro ABM but skeptical of “ABM Platforms,” this is for you. Who else should be included? Could you tag your favorites on this post? 🙏 I’ve been getting asked more and more for a “simpler way to do ABM” recently. Folks know they need to do ABM but unless they’re an enterprise org, with enterprise budgets, the large ABM platforms are simply overkill. They’re too expensive, too broad, and too difficult to adopt....